Your investigate is correct. we know some attorneys who have used a sale of a tiny commission seductiveness to equivocate a oppressive Medicaid order that a present of a tiny commission to one child is a present of 50%, present to dual children is a present of 2/3, etc. we privately never tested that approach, so you’d have to work with an profession who has used that successfully or is peaceful to try that.
Another thought is to have a child PURCHASE an seductiveness in a home, insert a right of survivorship to a child’s purchased seductiveness (in a deed), afterwards have a elder homeowner squeeze a Medicaid payments if required to spend down a deduction of a sale. They would validate for Medicaid immediately, and on genocide a home avoids probate and, presumption a state usually seeks estate liberation from probate assets, would also equivocate estate recovery.
Article source: http://medicaidsecretsforum.com/showthread.php?tid=471