You mother’s seductiveness in a homes would be distributed by augmenting a stream satisfactory marketplace value of a residence x a percent seductiveness of her life estate. These total are set out in supervision tables. Under a stream table, a value of a life estate for a chairman age 90 is .28221 (i.e., 28.221%). So greaten that by a stream 100% value of a houses (i.e., what we could get for them if sold, today) to find out a countable value of her seductiveness in these properties.
Since her percent seductiveness decreases with any flitting year, we would have to recalculate her seductiveness accordingly (the underlying value of a homes changes too, of course, depending on genuine estate values in a area).
I assume we meant she was a solitary owners until 2009? If so, afterwards on transferring a residue interests during that time, she done gifts equal to a residue seductiveness x a afterwards value of a properties. Once again, we need to deliberate a list to find out her percentage. If she were 87 during a time, a residue seductiveness was .67738, etc. Such gifts are indeed penalty-causing gifts if she relates for Medicaid within 5 years
Article source: http://medicaidsecretsforum.com/showthread.php?tid=480